Better Living Through Technology: a blog dedicated to emerging
technology trends in hardware, software, webware, marketing and beyond
 
 
 



« Review: PPC-6700 Smartphone | Main | HDV: why I hate it, but will buy it in a heartbeat »

The Digital Revolution - The Impact of Herman Hollerith
Brian Utley

The Digital Revolution ?¢‚Ǩ‚Äú A series of Disruptive Events

Since the invention of the Gutenberg printing press the world has seen a continuously increasing rate of technology driven change resulting in the highly technology driven environment we live in today. It is fair to say that the Gutenberg printing press caused a revolution in printed material. It was a disruptive event. Mechanizing the printing process forever changed not only the process of printing but the availability of affordable printed material. The first book to be printed, the Bible, now accessible by the masses likely spurred on the Protestant revolution. Students at Universities also now had access to a breadth of scholarly printed material, in business contracts could be standardized, documents printed and for all the newspaper industry came into being.

A disruptive event is a change in technology that has a pervasive, long lasting, cascading and irreversible effect on the direction of technology, on society and the status quo.  Some effects are subtle e.g. the long term effects are visible but the cause may not be readily identifiable, while others have an immediate and visible impact.

This is the first of a series of planned articles discussing the impact of the digital technology revolution as a series of disruptive events that continue unabated, even accelerated, today.

While there are a number of candidates who may be identified as the creator of the first major digital event, none in my mind rises to the level of Herman Hollerith (1860-1929).  Hollerith worked at the United States Census Bureau from 1879-1882 and became engrossed in finding ways to reduce the time and labor involved in census analysis by automation.  His objective: find a solution for the 1890 census.  Why was this effort important?  The last census (1880) was not completed until 1887.  Seats in the House of Representatives are apportioned based upon population as determined by the last census so the 7 years to complete the census was totally unacceptable having left many states in limbo regarding their representative allocations.  To compound the problem, the US population had increased by more than 12 million since the last census and the shift of population westward was well underway still further increasing the difficulty of taking the census.  

To solve this dilemma the Census Bureau decided to sponsor a competition in order to find a way to dramatically reduce the time required for taking and processing the census data.  Hollerith, in his travels by rail, had observed the use of what was called a "punch photograph".  Conductors would punch notches in the edges of a passenger's ticket which physically described the passenger in sufficient detail to allow only the described passenger to use that particular ticket.  A passenger's height, hair color, build, eye color, etc. could all be coded onto such a ticket by punching the indicated places around the edges of the ticket. Hollerith theorized that a similar scheme might work for the census.  He designed an approach and was awarded two patents, one in 1884 to use holes punched in paper tape to record and mechanically read that information, and the second in 1887 using holes punched in a paper card instead of tape.  The card needed to contain enough information to be useful for the census, so he settled on using the size of a US banknote; apparently he also saw an additional benefit by fitting cards in the same size boxes as used by the Treasury Department.

Herman Hollerith won this competition handily using his system of punching, reading and sorting the cards. The official 1890 population count was completed in three months and the total population of the United States was found to be 62,622,250.  In another two years all the census data was processed and organized.  The cost was $5 million below forecast and saved more than two years time.  He had not only solved the problem of the 1890 census but his solution was the basis for compiling census data for the next 70 years.

  Hollerith Tabulator
Shown above is the card tabulator with 40 dials for counting, one for each of up to 40 hole positions in the card. The pantograph punch for punching cards one hole at a time is on the left side of the table, a card reader is on the right side of the table and the sorting machine stands to the right.  The dials were each wired to 40 possible holes in the card reader.  In this early implementation each possible hole represented something to be counted.  It could be a state, county, city, country of origin, family size, ethnicity, age, sex etc. The pantograph had a mask which defined the content of each hole. Every time the reader sensed a hole the appropriate counter would increment and a pocket of the sorter would open according to the category identified by the holes punched.  An experienced operator could tabulate up to 80 cards per minute and then transcribe the results from the dial counters.  The initial card used 22 columns with 10 punch positions available per column.  This was gradually increased until it reached 45 columns with 12 positions per column.  A print of a card from the 1900 census is shown below.

  =
The cards were pre-printed with fields outlined according to the application.  Forty-five columns were available in this design.
 
Hollerith Census Counting Machine
The picture above shows more detail regarding the design of the machinery.

Hollerith incorporated his business as the Tabulating Machine Co in 1896. Interestingly; the company did not sell but rented its equipment and maintained the exclusive right to produce the cards. This did not change until the Justice Department sued IBM in the 1950's to make the tools for the manufacture of the cards available to competitors.  In 1911 the company merged with other companies to form the Computing Tabulating Recording Co.  In 1914 Thomas J. Watson joined the company and, through his leadership, dramatically enhanced its business.  In 1924 the name was changed to International Business Machines, becoming the IBM we know today.  The card design was extended to 80 columns, the holes were made rectangular and the design patented in 1928.  It remains the standard to this day.  Over time several attempts were made to either copy the Hollerith design or come out with alternatives but they never achieved the success of IBM.  Most notable of these was the Remington Rand Co. that extended the original card design to 90 columns by splitting each physical column into two groups of 6 holes each.  While Remington Rand achieved some success they were never able to match IBM in the marketplace.

What the punched card did was create a document that could be a basic business and accounting instrument regardless of the size of the organization.  A card was able to represent for example an account, a transaction, a part, an invoice, a check, a bond or a security and as a result businesses and governments could begin to automate their fundamental processes.  It eventually became known as a 'unit record' and IBM named the line of equipment designed to process the cards as Unit Record Equipment.  

The period after 1890 was one of dramatic economic growth putting great stress on businesses to keep up with the changes.  The transition to punched cards greatly facilitated the task of keeping up with sales, orders, inventory and accounting procedures.  The government used hundreds of machines during World War I to keep inventory, medical and psychological records.  So successful was this transition to punched cards that by 1918 over 100 million cards a month were being produced.  As the applications grew in volume the machines handling the cards became more and more sophisticated, ultimately being able to produce reports by the thousands of pages and process cards up to 1000 cards a minute.  All data was transcribed to punch cards. The card became the perfect medium for entering, manipulating and storing data.  There was no other medium that so perfectly encapsulated business information.  By long before the 1950's every industrialized nation was totally dependant upon these cards and the equipment that processed them.  IBM was a juggernaut in the marketplace not only because it had the lion's share of the business, but it also owned all the equipment due to its rent only policy and was the sole producer of the punched cards.  Cards had become the universal medium for handling data, and IBM machines processed the data.

This set the stage for the computer revolution that was to come.   When the computer arrived cards were the only vehicle for storing and maintaining programs.  Cards were the only source of data and until the 1970's when direct entry through terminals became available. Until then cards were the only way to feed the now prevalent computers.  More about this phase later.

In summary, Herman Hollerith was truly a giant when measured by the impact of his invention.  The introduction of the punched card was a disruptive event that changed the course of history.




TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.technologyevangelist.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.fcgi/47

Comments

1. Posted by: Ed Kohler on December 30, 2005 12:14 AM:

Fascinating. As someone who's introduction to computers started with a Mac brought home by my mother in the mid-1980's, this is entirely new.

The punch card really helps explain how they were able to gather so much information on one card.




2. Posted by: Jason Striegel on January 2, 2006 10:55 PM:

Great article!

It might alse be added that Watson developed a strong financial relationship with Nazi Germany during the second world war, laundering money through IBMs German subsidiary, Dehomag.

The Hollerith punch card system was used by the SS to streamline its census collection, allowing them to quickly classify, locate, deport, and exterminate millions of people with frightening efficiency. This is not to say that the Holocaust would not have occurred without this enabling technology, but it's quite possible that the Nazi regime would not have been as effective.

Coincidentally, the US used Hollerith machines to filter census data for the location and imprisonment of American Japenese.

This is just another testament to the fact that Hollerith's tabulating machines were a disruptive event of the largest scale. Its effects weren't limited to business processes, and census tabulation. It has changed the practices and processes of whole political and ideological systems, benign or otherwise, forever.




3. Posted by: Brian Utley on January 5, 2006 4:11 PM:

Responding to Jason's comments: Unfortunately, technology does not pick sides. Before WWII IBM was doing business in more than 30 countries and had invested in manufacturing plants in a number of them. It is also worth noting that IBM equipment also saw service with the US Armed Forces. In fact, the equipment was on the beaches of Normandy within a day of the landing June 6th 1944 providing logistic support for the invasion. It might also be said that without IBM's contribution to the Allied war effort the outcome might well have been different.
Thank you for your comment.




4. Posted by: Subhash Gogate , India on February 4, 2006 12:48 AM:

I was reading article on 'mouse' inventor Doug Engelbart and happened to read mention of Hollerith , and was pleased to read info on both pioneers of today's computer age .
I am not a computer expert , but feel that
we may see very few original thinkers in the current age of computers,because applications have been made too simple to use and leave little to thinking .




5. Posted by: olivia villafa?ɬ±a on February 10, 2006 5:19 PM:

This article is great!! but what I really was looking for was the history of Joseph Marie Jacquard (1752-1834) and the machine that he invented for knitting this tipe of fabrics. The machine of Hollerith and the one of Joseph Jacquard may have a lot of things the same. I would like you to have an article like this. thank you and sorry for my english!!




6. Posted by: Brian Utley on February 15, 2006 5:46 PM:

Thank you Olivia for your comments. Yes, there is not much information about Joseph Jacquard that remains but it is clear that the impact he had on the programable loom remains to this day.
Regarding Herman Hollerith, there are some significant diferences between them. Hollerith first tried to store data on a continuous paper tape but gave up on this solution because it was too unwieldy. Hollerith himself ascribed his switch to a punch card to his observation of a train ticket that was punched with holes that described the apperance of the ticket holder. This gave him the idea of using a card as a vehicle to hold information. This is to be compared to the Jacquard and Babbage applications that were for the purpose of holding program information. This differentiation is very important in understanding the uniqueness of Hollerith's invention.




Post a comment

Required fields marked with: *
Name*:


Email Address*:


URL:
Remember personal info?

Comments*:

HTML Tags you can use in your posts:
<b>Bold</b> = Bold
<i>Italicized</i> = Italicized
<a href="http://www.othersite.com">Link to Other Site</a> = Link to Other Site


Please keep comments on-topic. Contact authors or other commenters
directly for off-topic conversations.

Notify me of future comments via e-mail



Technology Evangelist Digest - Free Newsletter
Sign up for the free Technology Evangelist Digest to receive daily updates, editorials, and practical advice on emerging technology trends in hardware, software, webware, marketing and beyond.

Technology Evangelist Digest will keep you up to date on the technology trends that will help make you more productive and efficient both in business and your personal life.

Let's face it: If you made it to this line, you must have found something valuable on this page, right? Think about how cool it would be to have something free and interesting to read every day from Technology Evangelist by signing up today.

1. Fill in your email below,
2. Then click on the confirmation email you receive.
3. That's it. Your first Technology Evangelist Digest will arrive within 24 hours.




Previous Entries:


Tag Cloud