Better Living Through Technology: a blog dedicated to emerging
technology trends in hardware, software, webware, marketing and beyond
 
 
 



« YouTube Moves into FaceBook Territory with College Videos | Main | Will Minneapolis' New WiFi Network Hit 18% Penetration in Five Years? »

Google's Continued Role in Splogs Monetizing Your Blog's Content
Ed Kohler

Jeneane Sessum offers a likely commonly shared perspective on the ethics of splogs:

You don't have to be A list to be splogged.

"I've said about other sites that incorporate my RSS feed, as long as they aren't making money off my content or reframing it within a context I don't like. What you can't do is aggregate it onto a site AND SELL ADS or in any other way profit from it. If you wish to make ad revenue off my content, then we become business partners and agree to how much of the ad revenue each of us gets. We write it down. It's a business. And I'm choosey."
As I've mentioned before, splog (spam blog) publishers aren't the only people to blame for splogs. The ad networks - including Google AdSense - enable splogs by allowing sploggers to publish ads from their networks.

Three factors influence the splog problem we have today:

1. The ease of creating a blog.
2. The ease of scraping content from RSS feeds or directly from web sites.
3. Ad networks allowing sploggers to serve ads onto splogs.

Only one of those three factors can realistically be fixed, and that's the problem caused by ad networks like Google AdSense. There are a finite number of ad networks on the web with enough ad inventory to make splogging a justifiable business. If even a few of them - starting with Google Adsense - stopped partnering with sploggers, the problem would quickly drop to a more tolerable level.




TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.technologyevangelist.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.fcgi/405

Comments

1. Posted by: Mike on September 2, 2006 5:16 PM:

If I'm Google Adsense, I'd have to ask 'what is my motivation?' It would seem only to be 'how white does my hat need to be', and if they adopt the stance, they risk losing ad market share to Yahoo or smaller ad servers.

That being said, darn right Google should dusk off the gray on their white hat and stop the sploggers. Question then is who's who in the re-serving of other's content since many sites rely on content that is posted elsewhere to enhance both party's sites and traffic. Where do you draw the line? What about affiliate marketing sites, whose sole purpose is reselling and ads are integral to their existence? Well, the whole point is moot once net neutrality kicks all the small sites off the web, eh?

Keep these posts coming TE - Mike




Post a comment

Required fields marked with: *
Name*:


Email Address*:


URL:
Remember personal info?

Comments*:

HTML Tags you can use in your posts:
<b>Bold</b> = Bold
<i>Italicized</i> = Italicized
<a href="http://www.othersite.com">Link to Other Site</a> = Link to Other Site


Please keep comments on-topic. Contact authors or other commenters
directly for off-topic conversations.

Notify me of future comments via e-mail



Technology Evangelist Digest - Free Newsletter
Sign up for the free Technology Evangelist Digest to receive daily updates, editorials, and practical advice on emerging technology trends in hardware, software, webware, marketing and beyond.

Technology Evangelist Digest will keep you up to date on the technology trends that will help make you more productive and efficient both in business and your personal life.

Let's face it: If you made it to this line, you must have found something valuable on this page, right? Think about how cool it would be to have something free and interesting to read every day from Technology Evangelist by signing up today.

1. Fill in your email below,
2. Then click on the confirmation email you receive.
3. That's it. Your first Technology Evangelist Digest will arrive within 24 hours.




Previous Entries:


Tag Cloud