Web Based RSS Aggregator Rankings
The folks running the Hitwise blog continues to crank out interesting peeks into the data they collect. This time,
LeeAnn Prescott takes a look at the market share of RSS feed aggregators, including
Bloglines,
Rojo,
Newsgator,
Netvibes and
Google Reader:
For those of you unfamiliar with RSS aggregators, they're basically programs that allow you to create a custom news site. In some ways, it's similar to what you may be familiar with from a custom My.Yahoo page or a personalized Google Homepage, but it goes much further than that by bringing not only the headlines but the posts from blogs, news sites, photo galleries, comics, and classifieds into a single web page for fast and easy access to content you read regularly.
Personally, I'm a fan of Bloglines, which remains the top dog in this field. Here are some
previous stories on Bloglines.
Google Reader is a relatively recent entry into this field and has been growing as the application improves (
explained here).
I've barely tried Rojo, but whether you use Rojo for RSS aggregation or not, it's worth signing up with the service so you can get their weekly summary of the blogosphere where they look at everything from tech to politics to entertainment news.
Netvibes and Newsgator: Never tried them, but it doesn't really matter what I think. It's what works best for you that really matters.
Here are links to each of the five web based RSS aggregators listed above set up to allow you to add Technology Evangelist's RSS feed to your account. Let us know which service you think is easiest to use, have the most intuitive layout, and doesn't crash all that often.
Yes, graphs are fun. Interesting perspective on the data, Aaron.
1. Posted by: Aaron Landry on January 23, 2007 6:14 PM:
There isn't much question that Bloglines is the most popular of the web-based RSS readers any way you look at it, but I have to argue that the data presented LeeAnn Prescott's post is borderline pointless. She does mention that it doesn't take into consideration some types of readers but it also doesn't take into consideration some of the differences between some of the web-based RSS readers including the frequency of the updates and how much traffic those updates generate. As well, many of the services will generate one hit that ends up being utilized by a variable number of users. I bet if we were able to do a test of the same date range and the same services but had a theoretical graph of 5 total RSS feeds available on the internet in total and all 15 theoretical users of the internet subscribed to all 5 RSS feeds, the lines wouldn't be equal.
It's almost like arguing that "MySpace is bigger than Google" based solely off of the amount of traffic it generates.
Either way, graphs are fun.