Before blogs were king I ran community based forum web sites. I
would grow the community, allow it to flourish, find moderators
that I trusted then when it was self-sufficient I would move on to
my next community. It was fun, hard work and I learned exactly what
to do and what not to do.
I have not run a forum for a while, but once in a blue moon I
stumble across a technical support forum. Many times I want to do
something my product was not designed to do and so I post my
question in their support forum. This is a great way to get
information from the community of users who may or may not have an
answer for me.
We at Technology Evangelist have 3 high quality USB microphones. I would like to extend these microphones beyond what they were originally designed to do and make both of them run in SoundTrack Pro at the same time. This is clearly not the problem of the microphone manufacturer, but I would still like to ask someone how to make this happen. Rather than bug the vendor about it I figured I would ask my question in their support forums. This saves the the support phone call where I am told that "what I'm trying to do is not supported" and it possibly gets me an answer to my question. This all makes the company look great in my eyes even if the problem can't be solved, right?
Wrong.
I posted my original question asking for guidance on January 24th. The forum states that some messages may take 24 to 48 hours to go live. Fine. I wait 24 hours, nothing. I wait 48 hours, nothing. January passes and we move to February, still nothing.
I'm starting to get a little pissed now. I just want to know if
it's possible to do what I want. If I can't do it, that's OK I have
a different solution but at least I asked the community. I thought
maybe I had done something wrong, so I e-mailed the admin of the
forum. Almost immediately I got a response back saying that the
inbox was full and my message was rejected. OK, fine. Maybe they
just let someone go who took care of this, so I sent a message to
support asking for help in getting my message posted. That message
also got sent back to me as a full inbox, however, someone did
actually respond in kind (odd that I got an inbox full error but
they still got the message). The company representative explained, "Unfortunately, our
forum is heavily moderated due to the large amounts of spam and
other derogatory posts we used to get." Understood.
Here's the problem with moderating a forum like that. You have to
actually moderate it! I can accept waiting a few hours for a post
to go live, but not much more. Waiting days upon days for posts and
then having to e-mail asking to have my post go live is not an
acceptable answer. Rather than act as a useful tool for me and grow
my acceptance with the company, now I'm pissed at them and want to
return the product even though nothing is actually wrong with the
mics themselves. If the company is not willing to moderate the
channel, then there are ways to
cut down on spam
Moderating a forum and killing any message that's not
pro-product is a really bad idea. No product is perfect, some
people won't like said product. Pretending that these people don't
exist does not make it any better. Someone may not like the product
for the very same reason that I won't like it. Yes, this will
prevent me from buying it, but it will also prevent me from
returning it and forcing the company to re-take inventory of the
product, which in turn costs them money. The worst thing in the
world is to allow the post to go live then remove it, assuming the
post was done in good taste. A post with swearing, spam or anything
that does not contribute to the community as a whole can go away
without a second thought. A post that's against the product but
well thought out, well, there's no reason it should not go
live.
If a company can't get posts online as fast as possible and not
over-moderate the forum, then maybe it's best that they don't run a
forum at all. I have decided to sell the original mics and go with a mixer solution. An interesting example of where support forums work is with
Mackie. I was looking at a Mackie Onyx 1620 mixer and found out that the Firewire board would not do what I wanted. In the
Mackie forums other users complained,
one user found a solution and now I'm looking at buying that board again. It's amazing support that requires very little effort on Mackie's part.
1. Posted by: Dan on February 23, 2007 7:27 AM:
To use multiple audio devices in OS X simultaneously you can create an aggregate audio device:
http://www.apple.com/pro/techniques/aggregateaudio/
Any applications that use the OS for audio (such as Soundtrack) will see your 2 USB mics as one device.