Better Living Through Technology: a blog dedicated to emerging
technology trends in hardware, software, webware, marketing and beyond
 
 
 



« Trends for Gmail | Main | An Online Data Entry Pet Peeve »

Is Online PR About Messaging, Listening, or Both?
Ed Kohler

I get the impression the PR firms are currently in the middle on a painful transition from being broadcasters to conversationalists.

By this, I mean that PR folks come across as being good at helping companies determine what their public message should be in order to build trust and sell products or services. While that's fine, a new version of this is quickly becoming hard to ignore.

It's a tough concept for many traditional PR people to understand, but that doesn't make it any less valuable. The term I use for it is, "listening."

While sitting in a boardroom and deciding what customers want to hear over a bagels and coffee has its place, it's hardly as effective as listening to what actual customers are saying about your company's products or services in real time online.

I get the impression that some PR firms have caught onto this concept and are now providing their clients with reports on "what people are saying about you online." And, I get the impression that these updates are provided at regular intervals such as monthly.

That's a good start, but it falls way short of what should be happening. What needs to happen is real time reactions to comments rather than simply aggregating pissed off commentaries. You'll still need to do the aggregations, but you'll nip a lot more PR disasters in the bud by proving that business can listen and respond.




TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.technologyevangelist.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.fcgi/1488

Comments

1. Posted by: porridge on August 20, 2008 11:13 PM:

Good post, Ed. I'd love to discuss your initial take on PR as a "broadcast" function.

I believe PR has always been a management function about enabling communication between an entity and its publics. Altruistically, I push for that to be authentic, transparent and relevant to those publics, which means the communication must be educated, two-way and interactive. That's what I see really shifting these days.

My firm has a proprietary approach for what we call Digital Advocacy (it's actually trademarked), that includes the steps: Identify, Monitor, Tune, Participate, Produce and Measure. As part of monitoring, indeed, we recommend clients do a lot of listening. A LOT. We have clients who do daily -- sometimes 3 times/day, sometimes hourly -- monitoring of what their stakeholders are saying about their brand, industry, trends, etc. We also recommend a full benchmark landscape analysis and quarterly benchmarks to get a macro view of issues, sentiment, advocates and detractors.

From there we talk through next steps to participate and produce. To your point, you're not done once you launch a microsite, message board, blog or leave a follow-up comment to an angry Tweet. That's when you're just getting warmed up!

Love to grab a beer sometime and continue the conversation. -G.




2. Posted by: Graeme Thickins on August 21, 2008 11:07 AM:

you are so right, Ed....thanks for another great post!

cheers,
Graeme




3. Posted by: Marna on August 21, 2008 8:34 PM:

Some companies that understand the internet *is* a communications channel have been doing this. In fact, in 1996, I worked for a large financial institution that monitored all online board activity and evaluated impact on sales and developed crises plans against any product negativity. It was pretty cutting edge at the time.

What I'm seeing now is "listening" depends on how large an in-house communications staff is, or how large and agency retainer is. Hate to say it, but many companies treat listening as risk management and will only act or talk back if there's a significant bottom line impact. Impact to overall brand is never considered.

Great post - online is the first line of communications offense and defense.




4. Posted by: Roger on October 6, 2008 5:10 AM:

Hey there - I agree 100%. Old PR is mainly about pitching stuff to other influential people. Online PR is all about participating in discussions and being an influential person. I think companies in-house may be better geared for this than agencies. Certainly the role of the agency has to change from a 'pitch' service provider to more of a facilitator or enabler....




Post a comment

Required fields marked with: *
Name*:


Email Address*:


URL:
Remember personal info?

Comments*:

HTML Tags you can use in your posts:
<b>Bold</b> = Bold
<i>Italicized</i> = Italicized
<a href="http://www.othersite.com">Link to Other Site</a> = Link to Other Site


Please keep comments on-topic. Contact authors or other commenters
directly for off-topic conversations.

Notify me of future comments via e-mail



Technology Evangelist Digest - Free Newsletter
Sign up for the free Technology Evangelist Digest to receive daily updates, editorials, and practical advice on emerging technology trends in hardware, software, webware, marketing and beyond.

Technology Evangelist Digest will keep you up to date on the technology trends that will help make you more productive and efficient both in business and your personal life.

Let's face it: If you made it to this line, you must have found something valuable on this page, right? Think about how cool it would be to have something free and interesting to read every day from Technology Evangelist by signing up today.

1. Fill in your email below,
2. Then click on the confirmation email you receive.
3. That's it. Your first Technology Evangelist Digest will arrive within 24 hours.




Previous Entries:


Tag Cloud